How Quick Commerce Thrives on the Backs of Underpaid Delivery Partners
The Dark Side of 10-Minute Deliveries .How Quick Commerce Giants Exploit Delivery Partners for Speed and Profit .“10-minute deliveries sound great — until you see the cost: delivery partners earning Rs 15/order, risking lives, and facing fines. Time to rethink quick commerce. #GigEconomy #LaborRights” The Dark Side of 10-Minute Deliveries .How Quick Commerce Giants Exploit Delivery Partners for Speed and Profit
Introduction to Quick Commerce and Delivery Partners Quick commerce, offering deliveries in under 10–30 minutes, has transformed retail in India, with companies like Instamart, Blinkit, and Zepto leading the charge. However, this convenience relies heavily on delivery partners, who are often gig workers facing significant exploitation. These workers are crucial for picking up orders from dark stores and delivering them swiftly, but their working conditions raise serious concerns.
Exploitation and Working Conditions Research suggests that delivery partners are paid per delivery, with rates as low as Rs 15–25, often below minimum wage after expenses like fuel and phone data. For example, a delivery agent earned only Rs 300 for six hours on Diwali 2024, sparking online debate (Hindustan Times). They also face long hours, sometimes 12–14 hours daily, without benefits like health insurance or paid leave, as they are classified as independent contractors. This gig-based model allows companies to avoid labor protections, leaving workers vulnerable to financial instability.
The pressure to meet ultra-fast delivery targets, such as 10 minutes, forces delivery partners to take risks like speeding or ignoring traffic rules. In November 2024, Bengaluru traffic police collected ₹30.57 lakh in fines from delivery riders, highlighting the dangers they face (Drishti IAS). They also face heavy fines, loss of orders, and falling ratings for minor mistakes, pushing some to fake deliveries to avoid penalties.
Profits Over People: The Quick Commerce Scandal .Strikes, Fines, and Fake Deliveries Expose a Troubled Industry Profits Over People: The Quick Commerce Scandal
Real-Life Cases and Impact Real-life cases underscore the exploitation. In 2023, Blinkit changed its pay structure, reducing payouts from Rs 25 to Rs 15 per order, leading to strikes by 2,500 delivery partners in Delhi-NCR, with many joining rivals like Swiggy Instamart and Zepto (CNBC TV18). Comedian Kunal Kamra criticized these platforms on X, noting over 50% of gig workers earn below minimum wage after expenses, while companies scale up operations (Hindustan Times). The impact includes stress, fatigue, and accidents, with workers lacking job security or support for injuries.
Need for Regulation The evidence leans toward a need for better labor protections, with calls for fair wages, insurance, and fixed hours under the Code on Social Security, 2020. Regulating delivery timelines could also enhance safety, addressing the controversy around the gig economy’s lack of accountability.
Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of Exploitation in Quick Commerce This survey note provides a comprehensive examination of the exploitation faced by delivery partners in India’s quick commerce sector, focusing on companies like Instamart, Blinkit, and Zepto. It draws on recent reports, real-life cases, and public discourse to highlight the challenges and advocate for change, reflecting the editorial style of The Hindu with a formal yet accessible tone.
“Your 10-min delivery = their 14-hr day, no breaks, no insurance. Quick commerce’s convenience isn’t free — it’s cruel. #WorkerJustice” Life of a Delivery partner
Background and Context
Quick commerce, offering deliveries within 10–30 minutes, has seen explosive growth in India, with platforms like Blinkit, Zepto, and Swiggy Instamart expanding rapidly. The sector’s gross merchandise value (GMV) grew from $0.10 billion in FY20 to $3.3 billion in FY24, driven by consumer demand for convenience (Business Today). However, this growth relies heavily on delivery partners, who are often gig workers facing significant exploitation. These workers pick up orders from dark stores and deliver them swiftly, but their working conditions raise serious ethical and legal concerns.
Detailed Examination of Exploitation
Research suggests that delivery partners are paid per delivery, with rates as low as Rs 15–25, often below minimum wage after accounting for expenses like fuel, phone data, and vehicle maintenance. A notable case involved a delivery agent earning only Rs 300 for six hours of work on Diwali 2024, sparking online debate and highlighting financial instability (Hindustan Times). Comedian Kunal Kamra’s X post criticized quick commerce platforms, noting over 50% of gig workers earn below minimum wage after expenses, while companies scale up operations (Hindustan Times). Supporting comments from X users, like Ganeshan, emphasized the exploitation, stating, “Zero creativity — only exploitation. The delivery workers are stretched to a great extent for compensation that is not justified at all” (Hindustan Times).
Delivery partners also face long hours, often 12–14 hours daily, without breaks, and lack benefits like health insurance or paid leave. The gig-based model classifies them as independent contractors, allowing
companies to avoid labor protections under Indian law. This leaves workers vulnerable to financial insecurity, with no recourse for injuries or other hardships. A report by Drishti IAS highlighted that delivery riders often lack health insurance, accident coverage, and fixed working hours, exacerbating their vulnerability (Drishti IAS).
The pressure to meet ultra-fast delivery targets, such as 10 minutes, forces delivery partners to take risks like speeding, ignoring traffic rules, or faking deliveries to avoid penalties. In November 2024, Bengaluru traffic police collected ₹30.57 lakh in fines from delivery riders, indicating the extent to which they are willing to break rules to meet delivery times (Drishti IAS). They also face heavy fines, loss of orders, and falling ratings for minor mistakes, creating a vicious cycle where workers must take greater risks to maintain income. For example, if a delivery is marked late or there’s a customer complaint, partners may face deductions, further eroding their earnings.
“Instant groceries come with a price: delivery partners’ health, wages, & safety. Quick commerce must prioritize people. #ExploitationUnpacked”
Real-Life Cases and Incidents
Several real-life cases illustrate the extent of exploitation. In April 2023, Blinkit changed its pay structure, reducing payouts from Rs 25 to Rs 15 per order, leading to strikes by around 2,500 delivery partners in Delhi- NCR. This standoff resulted in over 1,000 workers joining rivals like Swiggy Instamart, Zepto, and Big Basket, highlighting dissatisfaction with the new pay structure (CNBC TV18, Inc42). Blinkit claimed the changes addressed delivery partner needs and improved customer experience, but the workers’ response indicated otherwise, with more than 100 dark stores temporarily shut down, impacting revenue by an estimated 1% (Inc42).
Another incident involved Kunal Kamra’s public criticism on X, where he called platform owners “thugs that are using data as oil without paying for the oil fields,” emphasizing the lack of fair wages and benefits (Hindustan Times). CA Akhil Agarwal supported this, noting studies show over 50% of gig workers report earning below minimum wage after expenses, while platforms rake in billions in valuation (Hindustan Times).
Impact on Delivery Partners’ Lives
The exploitation has profound impacts on delivery partners’ lives. Many work long hours, often without breaks, leading to stress, fatigue, and accidents. The lack of job security and benefits means they have little support when faced with injuries or other challenges. For instance, a report noted protests by gig workers demanding better pay and benefits in Bengaluru and Mumbai, reflecting widespread discontent (Drishti IAS). The financial instability is compounded by the fact that their wages are often below those of unskilled labor or MNREGA workers, yet they face additional penalties for minor mistakes, further eroding their income.
Need for Regulation and Better Labor Protections
The evidence leans toward a need for stronger regulations to address these issues. The Indian government introduced the Code on Social Security, 2020, aiming to provide social security benefits to gig and platform workers, but implementation needs strengthening to ensure delivery partners receive fair wages, insurance,
and other benefits (Drishti IAS). Companies should be mandated to offer health insurance, accident coverage, and fixed working hours to reduce exploitation. Regulating delivery timelines is also crucial to prevent overburdening riders and promoting road safety, addressing the controversy around the gig economy’s lack of accountability.
Comparative Analysis of Working Conditions
“Zepto, Blinkit, Instamart: Fast for us, unfair for them. Delivery workers deserve wages, not fines. Act now! #QuickCommerceTruth”
To provide a structured overview, here’s a table comparing key aspects of delivery partners’ working conditions across quick commerce platforms:
Aspect Details Wages Often Rs 15–25 per delivery, below minimum wage after expenses, e.g., Rs 300 for 6 hours on Diwali Working Hours Typically 12–14 hours daily, without breaks, leading to fatigue and stress Benefits Lack social security, health insurance, paid leave; classified as independent contractors Delivery Pressure Forced to meet 10-minute targets, risking speeding, traffic fines (e.g., ₹30.57 lakh in fines)Penalties Heavy fines, order losses, rating drops for minor mistakes, pushing some to fake deliveries Protests and Strikes Notable strikes, e.g., Blinkit’s 2023 pay cut led to 2,500 workers striking, joining rivals
This table highlights the systemic issues faced by delivery partners, reinforcing the need for systemic change.
Conclusion and Call to Action
While quick commerce has brought convenience to consumers, it has done so at the expense of delivery partners, who face exploitation through low wages, poor working conditions, and lack of protections. As consumers, we must recognize the human cost behind our convenience and advocate for better treatment. Only through stronger regulations, corporate accountability, and public awareness can we ensure the growth of quick commerce is sustainable and ethical, aligning with India’s labor rights framework.
“2,500 Blinkit riders struck in 2023 over pay cuts. Fines & fake deliveries are their reality. Quick commerce must answer. #WorkerRights #BlinkitStrike”
- Key Citations
- Kunal Kamra Questions Blinkit CEO On Wages For Delivery Partners, Talks About ‘Dark Side’ Of Quick
- Commerce
- Over 1,000 Blinkit delivery partners join Swiggy Instamart, and Zepto amid pay structure standoff: Report
- Rise of Quick Commerce in India
- Kunal Kamra asks Blinkit CEO to reveal wages of delivery partners, says quick commerce exploits gig
- workers | Trending
- About 1000 Blinkit Delivery Executives Join Rivals
About Author
Sheevum Goel 🚀 Brand'e'prenuer | Empowering FMCG Entrepreneurs | Championing Akhand Bharat "On a mission to Empower 600M Indians…simple.bio